Helmut Marko, Red Bull’s motorsport advisor, has criticized Mercedes for its approach to managing rookie drivers, specifically Kimi Antonelli, during his challenging debut season in Formula 1. Marko contrasted this with Red Bull’s method, emphasizing that the team protects its junior drivers from immediate high-pressure exposure in Formula 1, helping them develop more gradually within its junior structure.
Antonelli, an 18-year-old Italian racing talent, arrived in Formula 1 this year amid significant hype as a “once-in-a-generation” prospect. Initially strong, with points scored in five of his first six events, his form declined amid a series of retirements, causing visible emotional strain during the Belgian Grand Prix qualifying session. Despite the pressure, he showed resilience by finishing in the top ten at the Hungarian Grand Prix before entering the summer break on a more positive note.
Examining Kimi Antonelli’s fraught rookie season and its challenges
Kimi Antonelli’s entry into the sport came with lofty expectations fueled by his impressive junior career. However, his transition to Formula 1 has been tougher than anticipated, marked by inconsistent results and struggles to maintain confidence in his machinery. After a turbulent spell interrupted briefly by his first podium in Canada, the driver has publicly shown signs of struggling to find comfort with the car’s handling, leading to erratic performance and pressure.

At the Belgian Grand Prix, Antonelli appeared visibly emotional and vulnerable during media interviews, reflecting the psychological toll of adapting to Formula 1’s demands. Nevertheless, he managed a solid recovery with a strong race in Hungary, starting 16th and finishing 10th, suggesting promise remains despite current difficulties.
Marko defends Red Bull’s developmental approach against claims of harshness
During an interview with F1 Insider, Marko addressed comments suggesting that Red Bull would have discarded Antonelli had he been a Red Bull junior facing a dip in form. Marko firmly rejected this notion, highlighting Red Bull’s structured junior program where young drivers begin in lower-pressure environments before graduating to Formula 1.
“Our juniors first drive for the Racing Bulls and aren’t immediately exposed to the pressure of F1. We also don’t create hype around a young driver before they’re in an F1 car.”
—Helmut Marko, Red Bull Motorsport Advisor
He acknowledged Red Bull’s advantage in having a junior team specifically designed to nurture emerging talent, a resource not currently available to Mercedes.
Pressure and development: The difficulties Kimi Antonelli faces at Mercedes
Marko pointed out the absence of a Mercedes junior team, explaining this lack hinders their ability to support drivers like Antonelli through the early, difficult stages of their Formula 1 careers. He also revealed that during a recent conversation at the Spa hotel, Antonelli confessed to lacking confidence in his car, particularly struggling when pushing its limits due to its critically sensitive setup.
“I mean, they [Mercedes] don’t have a junior team,”
Marko said.
“Kimi just needs to be given time to recover, just as [Liam] Lawson rediscovered his form with Racing Bulls. But thankfully, Mercedes doesn’t have the luxury of a second team.”
Antonelli’s challenges appear to be as much mental as technical, as he tries to cope with the demanding characteristics of the Mercedes car, which, according to Marko, behaves similarly to Red Bull’s own difficult machines.
Current standings and future outlook for Antonelli and the championship battle
Despite the setbacks, Antonelli has accumulated 64 points this season and currently sits seventh in the Drivers’ Championship, trailing teammate George Russell by 106 points. Russell, in fourth position, is locked in a competition with Max Verstappen and McLaren teammates for podium spots in the 2025 season. Antonelli’s capacity to regain confidence and adapt under pressure will likely shape the next phase of his Formula 1 career.
Marko’s defense of Red Bull’s junior strategy and critique of Mercedes‘ approach sheds light on the intense pressures placed on young drivers in Formula 1, highlighting how developmental environments can significantly impact rookie success and psychological well-being. As Antonelli continues to navigate these challenges, the effectiveness of each team’s approach to nurturing talent remains a key narrative in the sport’s ongoing evolution.

