The New England Patriots find themselves facing difficult decisions regarding their recent signing, wide receiver Stefon Diggs, after a video surfaced showing him holding an unidentified pink substance aboard a boat surrounded by several women. The exact timing and substance remain unclear, sparking debate about Diggs’ future with the team amid contract considerations and public scrutiny.

Potential Impact on the Patriots’ Contract Decisions

According to Scott Zolak of 98.5 The Sports Hub, the video controversy could potentially lead to Diggs being cut from the Patriots, as noted by Justin Leger of NBC Sports Boston. Mike Florio, also of NBC Sports, analyzed Diggs’ contract for possible measures the team might use to sever ties without incurring the full financial consequences of the deal. One key factor is that all guarantees are conditional upon Diggs passing a physical exam, which is currently pending due to his ACL injury that ended his 2024 season prematurely.

Contract Clauses That Might Influence Outcomes

Florio outlined several contractual provisions that could assist the Patriots in limiting their financial commitment. Notably, if the team‘s doctor withholds clearance during the physical, the Patriots could avoid paying most guarantees. Additionally, a clause related to pre-existing conditions might enable the team to sidestep paying $10.6 million out of the remaining $12.6 million in guarantees, following the initial $4 million signing bonus installment.

However, such decisions might not go uncontested, as Diggs could file a grievance similar to one filed previously by former Patriots receiver Antonio Brown. Brown challenged the team’s refusal to pay a $9 million signing bonus portion, eventually settling for $5 million. Florio speculates that a comparable resolution might be achievable for Diggs, potentially reducing the Patriots’ financial exposure.

Challenges in Proving Contract Violations

Another aspect of Diggs’ contract prohibits

participate…in any conduct or activity that is illegal, unlawful, or immoral.

Nevertheless, establishing a violation would require confirming the nature of the pink substance, which remains unknown, and demonstrating that Diggs engaged in wrongdoing under the contract’s terms. Given the difficulty in substantiating either, and the unlikelihood of an NFL suspension, the Patriots could face significant hurdles proving a breach of contract.

Possible Team Responses and Next Steps

Ultimately, the Patriots may opt to overlook the video controversy and retain Diggs, banking on his on-field value despite the concerns. Should they decide to pursue separation, several contractual pathways appear available for mitigating their financial responsibilities. This situation adds pressure on the organization as they consider both legal and reputational consequences amid growing public attention.