
Tyler Herro, the Miami Heat guard, sparked widespread surprise when he openly expressed disbelief in many historical events during a recent live stream. The 25-year-old made headlines after declaring that he doesn’t believe in history as it is commonly taught, challenging widely accepted occurrences such as the moon landing and Christopher Columbus’s voyage. This unexpected stance emerged on a Twitch stream while Herro interacted with popular streamers N3on and Adin Ross.
Controversial Remarks During Live Stream With Twitch Personalities
During the session, the trio answered viewers’ questions, including one about Wilt Chamberlain’s status among NBA greats. Herro admitted to not knowing much about Chamberlain’s playing style or appearance. When asked if he believed Chamberlain truly scored 100 points in a 1962 game, Herro gave a nonchalant affirmative response before proceeding to question the validity of recorded history altogether.
“I don’t even know what Wilt looked like, played like,”
Tyler Herro said.
“You think history is a real thing?”
Herro asked during the stream.
“Nah, I don’t believe in history, No, I’m deadass.”
Tyler Herro stated, shaking his head.
Rejection of Events Predating 1950 and Doubts About Columbus
Prodded further by Ross on whether Herro was dismissing events from centuries ago, the player was firm in denying such history. When questioned about the moon landing in 1969, Herro expressed skepticism, extending his disbelief to numerous historical milestones. He specifically questioned Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the Americas, showing doubt toward the accepted 1492 date and mentioning he never encountered this information in school.
“Nah, I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe in anything that happened before 1950,”
Herro explained.
“For real, like, how do we know? When did he come to the land or whatever? They said 1492?”
Herro asked.
Implications of Rejecting Established History
Herro’s outright denial of significant historical events has unsettled fans and observers, drawing attention due to his public profile and the certainty of his statements. Questioning some specifics or the moon landing alone might be controversial but somewhat common; however, rejecting history as a whole challenges the foundations of shared knowledge and education. His comments open discussion on how history is perceived and trusted in modern society, especially when voiced by prominent figures in sports and entertainment.
As this story gains traction, it remains to be seen whether Herro will provide further clarification or reconsider his stance. For now, his remarks have left many puzzled and skeptical about the understanding of history within public discourse.