Ferrari teammates Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton went head-to-head in a lively trivia challenge featured on the Italian team’s Instagram on July 10, testing their knowledge in a fast-paced buzzer contest. The Charles Leclerc Ferrari challenge captivated fans by showcasing their competitive spirits off the track.
In the age of social media, Formula 1 teams often share engaging content to keep followers entertained between race weekends. Ferrari’s latest video presented the two drivers answering trivia questions, with a unique twist: some queries were related to their recent partner, IBM. Each driver had a buzzer, and the first to hit it got to answer the question.
The contest kicked off with Hamilton correctly estimating the number of Ferrari fans worldwide at 396 million, though he remarked,
“I think there are more than that.”
Leclerc then revealed that he plays the violin when the trivia touched on musical instruments, amusing both drivers after Hamilton guessed bagpipes as a playful counterpoint.
The quiz alternated between general Ferrari questions and facts about IBM, reflecting the partnership the Italian team signed toward the end of 2024. Ferrari’s collaboration with IBM recently led to the launch of an upgraded Ferrari app in May 2025, integrating AI technology to enhance the user experience.
When asked about Ferrari’s historic number of race wins, Hamilton gave an answer before both drivers simultaneously responded to the final IBM-related question, resulting in a tie. Hamilton jokingly commented,
“We never like to finish on a tie.”
Lewis Hamilton’s Assessment of the SF25 at the British Grand Prix Amid Challenging Conditions
During the 2025 British Grand Prix, Lewis Hamilton began the race in fifth position but was overtaken after the first pitstop by early pitters. Despite this setback, Hamilton managed impressive overtakes on Lance Stroll, George Russell, and Pierre Gasly, though he struggled with control issues and went off track several times.
Reflecting on his car’s performance in wet conditions, Hamilton described the SF25 as difficult to handle in such demanding circumstances. He said,
“As it showed there was plenty of mistakes out there and very, very tricky conditions, in really a very, very hard car to drive here – this car doesn’t like those conditions. Not ideal, but we got some points at least.”
He further explained tire degradation and handling difficulties, adding,
“The tyres [were] dropping off, the car doesn’t like low-speed corners, lots of understeer, and I started knocking out the left front and then just couldn’t keep up.”
Charles Leclerc also had a rough race, finishing 14th out of 15 runners. His frustration was apparent as he demanded explanations from Ferrari about the car’s underperformance compared to expectations.
Significance of the Trivia Challenge and Implications for Ferrari’s Season
The trivia contest between Leclerc and Hamilton revealed a lighter, more competitive side of the drivers beyond their on-track rivalry, highlighting their personalities as teammates in a high-pressure environment. It also served to spotlight Ferrari’s partnership with IBM, underlining the team’s focus on integrating advanced technology such as AI into fan engagement through its redesigned app.
Meanwhile, the British Grand Prix underscored ongoing technical challenges for Ferrari’s SF25 in adverse conditions, affecting both drivers’ performances. Hamilton’s candid comments and Leclerc’s dissatisfaction suggest the team faces a critical period to improve car handling and race results. How Ferrari responds to these difficulties will be pivotal for their progress as the season continues.
Our Reader’s Queries
Q. Is Charles Leclerc a millionaire?
A. By 2025, Charles Leclerc is believed to have a net worth of about $125 million. Most of his wealth comes from a high-paying Ferrari contract, race wins, and sponsorships.
Q. Does Charles Leclerc have a PhD?
A. Dr. Charles Leclerc earned his doctorate in neuropsychology from Université de Montréal, following a clinical/scientist approach. His research, which resulted in several scientific articles, explored how the brain reorganizes itself when certain areas receive little or no stimulation.