During the New York Yankees’ second game of the weekend series against the Boston Red Sox on Friday night, Aaron Judge faced a contentious moment in his first at-bat against pitcher Brayan Bello. Despite seeing four pitches, Judge did not swing at any, as none were called within the strike zone. However, home plate umpire Lance Barrett did not award Judge a walk, instead calling three consecutive pitches as strikes, ending the at-bat without a swing.
Judgment Questioned Amid Close Calls
Reviewing the at-bat, the pitches were not dramatically outside the strike zone, and each individual call might not have raised eyebrows. Yet, the decision to call three straight strikes on borderline pitches to Judge has drawn significant criticism and unease from fans and analysts alike. The sequence cast doubt on the umpiring fairness and triggered widespread frustration across social media.
“Three called strikes in a row to Aaron Judge in his first inning strikeout. Home plate umpire Lance Barrett had all three of these as strikes. pic.twitter.com/zvzpZc2hgj” —Max Goodman
This incident highlights ongoing concerns over the consistency of Lance Barrett’s calls, as the Yankees have historically expressed disagreement with his strike zone judgments. The tension between players and umpiring decisions remains a focal point in this high-stakes rivalry.
Implications for the Yankees and MLB Officiating
The disputed strike zone controversy involving Aaron Judge emphasizes the growing attention on umpiring accuracy in Major League Baseball games, particularly in intense matchups like Yankees versus Red Sox. Such questionable calls can impact the flow of the game and potentially affect team morale during critical moments of the season.
As the series progresses, fans and analysts will be watching closely to see if umpiring decisions improve in fairness and reliability, especially when key players like Judge are at the plate. The controversy also adds pressure on MLB officials to maintain consistency in calling strikes to preserve competitive integrity.

