Satou Sabally and the Phoenix Mercury recently faced criticism after raising concerns about the demanding WNBA schedule, which has players competing in back-to-back games against playoff contenders late in the season. This issue has drawn attention as many teams endure compressed fixtures, prompting debate on player health and league priorities.
Throughout the season, several players and fans noted the intensity of the schedule, which often forced multiple games into short periods. The WNBA‘s 2025 calendar has been criticized for not adequately considering athlete well-being, especially given the physical toll of consecutive matches. Even as the league experienced record attendance and major TV viewership, these gains have not quelled players’ dissatisfaction with the condensed game plan.
Player Concerns Amplified by Back-to-Back Challenges in Late Season
Satou Sabally voiced strong objections following her game against the Las Vegas Aces, highlighting the risks of back-to-back games so late in the season. Sabally argued that the WNBA disregarded player safety, a concern shared by various team members who feel overextended by such scheduling demands when the playoffs approach.
Former NBA player Patrick Beverley reacted to Sabally’s complaint during his podcast, emphasizing his own experience with heavy game loads. Beverley remarked on the toughness required in professional basketball, suggesting that back-to-back games are a standard part of the sport’s rigor.
“I’m rooting. These ladies deserve more money. But c’mon, man, you’ve got to play back-to-backs, man. Before the lockout came, we were playing back-to-back-to-backs, 3 times. You had to play 3 games in a row. I’m all with it, but don’t lose me there now.” —Patrick Beverley, Former NBA Player
His comments implied that such scheduling should be expected and that complaints might deter fans’ interest. Beverley’s stance reflects a common perception from the NBA perspective, where players regularly face tightly packed game intervals.
WNBA Roster Limitations Make Schedule Strain More Severe
This perspective was challenged by Associated Press voter and journalist Eden Laase-Derouin, who pointed out significant differences between the WNBA and NBA that impact players’ ability to manage such schedules. According to Laase-Derouin, the smaller roster sizes and off-season commitments of WNBA players increase their vulnerability to fatigue and injury.
“Here’s the thing: WNBA rosters have 12 players. NBA rosters have 15 players and up to 18 with two-way contracts. Plus, WNBA players are playing in other leagues during their offseason, which means more wear and tear on the body. It’s important to have all the facts.” —Eden Laase-Derouin, AP Voter and Journalist
This explanation clarifies the structural challenges unique to the WNBA, where teams have fewer players and less flexibility to rest or replace fatigued athletes. Additionally, many WNBA stars engage in international or alternative league play during the off-season, intensifying physical demands year-round.
For example, the Indiana Fever have struggled to maintain consistent lineups after injuries, with procedural rules preventing the immediate signing of replacement players until absences are officially recorded. In contrast, NBA teams benefit from larger rosters and more versatile contract options, such as two-way deals and short-term contracts, which provide greater roster depth and injury contingency.
Strategic Player Management Amidst Demanding Schedule
Recognizing the challenge presented by their packed schedule, Phoenix Mercury head coach Nate Tibbetts opted to manage playing time carefully, especially after facing the strong Las Vegas Aces. Sabally and key starters saw limited court time in that tough matchup to preserve their energy for upcoming games.
The subsequent game against the Golden State Valkyries offered a more favorable opportunity for the Mercury. Winning this matchup was crucial as it secured a four-day rest period before their next stretch of road games on the West Coast, helping maintain player stamina and momentum during the critical stretch before playoffs.
In the victory over the Valkyries, Sabally, alongside Alyssa Thomas, Kahleah Copper, and DeWanna Bonner, played major roles, contributing significantly to the 81-72 home win. Such wins are key for teams tightly contesting playoff positions, where even small advantages in rest and recovery can impact postseason success.
Implications for Player Health and Future Negotiations
These scheduling concerns underscore the broader debate over how professional women athletes are supported compared to their male counterparts. Although the league’s weekend-heavy structure has drawn higher attendance and viewership, it may come with unintended consequences for player health and longevity.
As the current season progresses toward the playoffs, many WNBA players and advocates are pushing for changes in the collective bargaining agreement to increase roster sizes and improve contractual provisions that would address issues like the back-to-back game burden and mid-season roster stability.
Improved scheduling considerations and expanded player protections would aim to balance league growth with athlete welfare, potentially influencing the future of the WNBA’s competitive environment and international reputation.